Trouble recording with line in and microphone input

I’m using antix linux. I’m on ardour 7. I have a casio ct s500 connected from my line out of my casio to the line in on my pc.

I open ardour 7 and select ALSA as an input. I add a track (audio).

If I hit my casio ct s500 then the bar display shows I am getting an input on ardour.

However if I plug in my microphone then I can’t seem to get it to display any input.

I’ve got round this in the past by recording my casio ct s500 on one track. Unplugging the plug to the line in feed and then plugging in my microphone to record over my previous track.

For some reason I installed pipewire from my repository but at the end of the day; I’m not really sure what I’m doing. Which part of the manual should I read? This seems to be a bit of a jungle.

You can’t just plug the microphone cord into a line level input and expect to get any meaningful signal.
The mic output level is much lower than what a line input expects, so you’ll need a preamp between the mic and the input to boost the signal to a proper level.

Yes, I know the line level is roughly 1 volt. The microphone level is a lot less.

To put it more simply. I have the line feed plugged in and the microphone plugged in. I record a track on the line in, on ardour 7. I add another track and it doesn’t seem to recognise the microphone as an input.

Your audio interface likely has more than 1 input/recording source; the first track gets the mic input; the 2nd track gets the next one …

Okay. As you can see from my screenshot. I’ve set audio one to be my microphone. I’ve set audio 2 to be my line in.

I’m recording on both tracks as you can see. Just saying “hello, hello, hello” into the microphone.

However the signal is being recorded by audio 1 and audio 2. I can’t understand that.

All this stuff with Alsa, Jack and pulseaudio and pipewire. It’s all a bit of a mystery.

There’s actually rarely any mystery at all. More typical is misunderstanding caused by the fact that things change faster than people’s experience of “documentation” does …

Your screenshot actually doesn’t show connections at all. To show that, open Window > Audio Connections and switch the left side tab to “Hardware” and the bottom tab to “Tracks”, then post the result.

Screenshot_2026-01-16_18-41-46

So I set track one to be the microphone and track 2 to be stereo line in.

I hope you can help me to figure out what’s going on. I’m 95% it is probably me at fault.

1 Like

As you can see in the screenshot, your second track has 2 inputs (L & R); one of them is connected to the first input and one to the second.

This is all precisely as intended - it is what Ardour does by default, because with “pro-audio” interfaces and workflows, it’s generally what is desired.

With your built-in audio interface, you’ll need to connect/disconnect things by hand, because there’s no way for Ardour to know what to do with the hardware you have, since it also cannot understand what you’re intending.

It is a little suprising to me that the second input shows as only a single channel, since I think you said it was a line in connection.

Just click on the green dot that shows the connection between “R” and “Main In 1”, then click on the square below it. At that point, “Audio 2” will have two channels connected to the same input channel, on the 2nd input.

You may want to investigate whether you can actually get stereo from the line in connection. If not, you don’t want a 2-input track …

2 Likes

Thank you for your response. After a bit of digging around and asking Chatgpt. It came up with this very telling response. (see below)

10. The key limitation (very important)

On most onboard sound chips:

:x: You cannot record mic and line-in as separate sources at the same time

Because:

  • Only one capture source can be selected
  • ADC is shared

That’s why people buy:

  • USB audio interfaces
  • Mixers with USB out
1 Like