I now connected the output of the turntable to the Fireface and recorded the vinyl directly. This worked fine with the Fireface and a grounding cable connected to it. Interestingly, the different record companies seem to use different equalization curves for producing the vinyl cut. Which EQ can boost 30 Hz by +25dB and cut 15 KHz by -14.3dB, for example? The EQ’s I have go max. ±12dB. Which cut equalization have I now captured via the recording directly from the turntable? And which cut equalization curve does my Yamaha amplifier use for the turntable?
Questions upon questions… If anyone has any sources of info, I’m interested.
Each company used slightly different cutting EQ through the 1940’s and into the 1950’s, but in the mid-1950’s the Recording Industry Association of America introduced a recommended standard that all the record companies were using by around 1960.
wiki article on RIAA equalization
Presumably your audio interface has flat frequency response, so you will need to use RIAA EQ either on playback, or more likely process the file so that you can then play it back through flat frequency response equipment.
The term to search for is RIAA plugin. Should be several available, or you can also process using SoX, and I think ffmpeg may have an RIAA filter now as well.
Your Yamaha will use the RIAA standard curve. There are speciality preamps which let you select different EQ curves, but those are for use in playing back records from the first available through mid to late 1950’s. Very few of those original disks are left, so for the most part if you need an adjustable EQ you know it.
There are quite a few articles around on the history of disk cutting and playback equalization. Many of them are quite old, it was a more relevant topic in the peak of vinyl use, or when not quite so far removed from the old disks which had different EQ standards. That Wikipedia article I linked above is a good starting point.
Any disks which need non-RIAA standard EQ would be at least 70 years old by this point, I would think very rare.
If you’re running Ardour 8.2 or older from this site, or your distro’s version, you may be able to use Calf Emphasis; which has a RIAA preset.
I haven’t found any other free/open source plugin with a RIAA EQ.
If you want to do it manually the LSP EQs go from -50 to +20 dB, so you should be able to get an approximation there, and the x42 EQ is -18 to +18 dB.
Thanks Chris, I found a table “Non-RIAA Equalization Data” which mentions different EQ settings e.g. for Teldec, RCA, Columbia etc. I guess that threw my understanding off a bit. And I’ve come to believe that there are different curves for certain genres. And now I also read in the table the years that were all before the 60s. Anyone who can read has an advantage.
Thanks Peder, I got Ardour 8.2 from this site and the EQ from x42 as well. I can’t use Calf and the LSP plugs because they don’t run on Windows. I can’t use my wonderful AD-DA converters from RME Fireface UC USB with Linux because this device is not supported by Linux, or better now RME does not support Linux.
You can compile LSP for Windows looking at the BUILDING section here
I modified the process slightly, as seen here
There appears to be some slight issues with running the plugins, as seen in the subsequent posts in that thread, but it should work reasonably well.
You can compile LSP for Windows
Maybe I’ll do that someday, but right now I’m busy getting to know Mixbus and my musicality.
I have the beginner’s luck to have a ‘digital’ live recording of 13 tracks; a set of seven songs played by my band at the Berlin club “Aufsturz” in 2008 as a learning project. This multi-miked recording offers everything you need to get to know a DAW and your own musical character in terms of sound.
Edit: In terms of the vinyl RIAA curve, your reference to the x42 EQ was a good one! I use the x42 EQ on the drums and I’m amazed at how low it goes.
ZamPhono is available for free and may be of help to you. Hitting the ‘Reproduction [Play an LP]’ button changes to ‘Production [Cut]’
Here is the link for the downloads. They are available for Win64 bit as well. There are plenty of other worthwhile plugins included. ZamMaxim2 is noted by the author as being one of the best in the series. Zam Audio Homepage
Many thanks for your research. Now that I have two built-in RIAA curves, one in the “Yamaha AX-490” turntable preamplifier and the other in the “Zam Phono” plug-in, I can now compare them.
When I listen to the direct recording from the turntable > RME with the “Zam Phono” plugin connected upstream, it has less treble than the recording from the turntable > Yamaha AX-490 > RME.
What makes the difference?
What is the input impedance of the RME? Phono cartridges are designed with the expectation that the input of the preamp is 47k Ohms, with capacitance which varies by model of cartridge. 47k Ohms is the standard for moving magnet cartridges, moving coil cartridges typically are designed for very low input impedance, on the order of 100 Ohms, but I don’t believe there is as much standardization as for moving magnet.
If you use a microphone amplifier with a typical 1.5k to 2.5k input impedance the inductance of the cartridge interacting with the input impedance of the preamplifier will cause a drop in high frequencies.
With a standard audio interface the best choice would likely be using the instrument input, and place a separate resistor across the input in parallel to bring the (typically 1M Ohm) input impedance down to the 47k moving magnet phono standard.
Ahh, thanks for the information, I used the first two inputs via jack sockets, and according to the manual they are 8kOhm balanced. But now I’ve also realized that this approach is not any easier for the normal case.
not sure if helpful here, but I use for vinyl a lot for vinyl mastering and for kind of a “preview” of how the record will sound when played back when adding groove wear while playback (not for rendering though) ToVinyl4 | Airwindows
Interesting, but that would be the other way round;-)
Thank you
Hello, on the page Yamaha AX-490 Stereo Integrated Amplifier Manual | HiFi Engine, both the user manual and the service manual are available, very useful in this case.
In the attached image you can see the phono input circuit, which is the circuit that equalizes-adapts-adjusts the sound appropriately and then takes it to the input selector as seen in the other image.
The signal that comes out of the eq amp (phono amp) is already a “normal” level signal (line) that can be directed and used as other signals such as radio, aux, etc.
This configuration was very common, a previous stage is used, the eq amp (phono amp), and then it is sent to where it is needed, in this case the input selector of the yamaha/ax-490, so the signal from the rec selector, when selecting the phono, can be used like any of the others.
Although it was less common, some turntables included the phono amp inside the turntable itself.
Another thing is that it sounds good, because the different manufacturers adjusted the RIAA equalization filter differently, although “normally” within the limits of the RIAA standard.
Finally, there is the equipment that you use to record the Yamaha’s rec output. As I understand it, you send it to an RME Fireface UC USB Totalmix, which is not bad at all. This brand has a reputation for sounding clean and very clear, but I’m sure there are people here who know the rme and can advise you on the appropriate settings for what you need.
I hope I have helped, greetings.
Thank you for your contribution. I didn’t think my request would attract so many interested parties. Yes, it is still an open project and my next task will be to solder a cable connection. An XLR connection with a 45kOhm resistor or a jack plug connection with a 39kOhm resistor to achieve the required 47kOhm. I have not yet been able to obtain these resistors.
That does not sound right. Can you go through the details of what you were planning to try?
[edit] I looked back and the previous comment and realized that you must be planning on adding a 39k resistor in series with the signal while using the input with 8k input impedance.
That will be bad for noise, all of the thermal noise from the 39k resistor will be added to the signal from the phono cartridge.
The better approach would be to use the instrument input and add a 50k resistor in parallel to the 1M device input impedance. That will be just over 47k in combination, close enough.
Actually let me be a little more precise: resistors are available in standard values, so if you purchase a 5% accuracy resistor you will have the choice of 47k or 51k. Either would be OK.
If you purchase a 1% accuracy resistor you could use a 48.7k which would be just a little under 47k in parallel to the 1M input impedance, or 49.9k, which would be just over 47k in parallel with the 1M input impedance.
The exact input impedance isn’t that critical, so you could use any of the four values discussed above, which ever is easiest to acquire, and it should be close enough to the nominal design value of 47k to work fine.
Connect the resistor across the tip and ring contacts of a TRS plug and use inputs 3 and 4 of your Fireface UC.
The transfer from the turntable directly into the fireface input 1 + 2 worked. However, the recording then had a treble loss which they described as not meeting the expected 47kOhms. So far understood. Now I wanted to increase the missing resistance at the input to 47kOhm. To do this, I would like to fit the XLR to jack plug with the missing resistor.
Another problem is that I haven’t found an electrical retailer who sells me the quantity 2.
As mentioned in my previous post adding a series resistor will add the thermal noise in series as well.
One detail I did not elaborate was that a series resistor will also form a voltage divider with the input impedance of the interface, resulting in around 15dB less signal, which would have to be compensated by increasing the interface gain by 15dB.
So the noise is increased, and the signal level is decreased. The result would likely be unacceptable signal-to-noise performance.
As mentioned the better solution is not to increase the impedance of the 8K input with a series resistor, but decrease the 1M input impedance of the instrument input with a parallel resistor.
I also see that you are using a TS plug, even though the audio interface has a differential input and can accept a TRS plug. It would require some slight rewiring of the turntable, but connecting the cartridge differentially to the interface might be slightly better performance.
Thank you very much Chris. I’m not familiar with electrical engineering and can’t follow. I will not solder any plugs and accept the realization that it makes a difference to record from the amplifier or to plug the turntable cables directly into the recording device. I wanted to use an old record from my former band as a reference for a current mix of another recording, that was the original idea, but I’m putting it on hold now.
Your original configuration with turntable to Yamaha amp, and aux out to your RME is just fine for that. The direct recording approach is of interest to archivists and hardware hobbyists, but is just a distraction to your needs.